Bots as online impersonators
automated manipulators and their different roles on social media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/irie402Keywords:
social bots, astroturfing, grounded theory, Twitter, election, BrazilAbstract
Social bots are automated agents programmed to act on social media impersonating human behaviour to influence discussions online. This paper aims to contribute to the discussion of how bots can endanger online communication and alter information flows. We resorted to a mixed-method approach based on grounded theory and observational techniques in order to investigate the bots’ activities online during the 2016 municipal elections in Rio de Janeiro. We collected related content on Twitter in this period and detected 3,101 bots. This sample was classified in three categories based on tweeting content: user-generated bot, media spambot, and political bot. Our findings indicate that, although bots work for different political and social purposes, their computational nature claims into service of dominant social groups and economical elites. We conclude that computational propaganda is building a dangerous scenario of widespread automation in which different kinds of algorithms bias social media conversation.
References
Albuquerque, A.L. “Eleição no Rio tem Tática “Antiboato” e Suspeita de Uso de Robôs.” Folha de São Paulo, 18 October, 2016, https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/eleicoes-2016/2016/10/1823713-eleicao-no-rio-tem-tatica-antiboato-e-suspeita-de-uso-de-robos.shtml. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Alves, M. “Redes de Campanha na Eleição do Rio de Janeiro em 2016.” Compolítica vol. 7, no. 2, 2017, pp. 87–120, https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2017.7.2.122. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Arnaudo, D. “Computational Propaganda in Brazil: Social Bots During Elections.” In Working Paper 2017.8, eds. S. Woolley and P.N. Howard. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda, 2017, pp. 1–39.
Bezerra, A. C. “Vigilância e cultura algorítmica no novo regime de mediação da informação.” Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, vol. 22, no. 4, 2017, pp. 68–81, http://portaldeperiodicos.eci.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/2936. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Bourdieu, P. Sociology in question. Theory, Culture & Society Series. London: SAGE Publications, 1993.
Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. 1984th Reprint ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Bradshaw, S., and P.N. Howard. “Troops, Trolls and Troublemakers: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation.” In Working Paper 2017.12, eds. S. Woolley and P.N. Howard. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda, 2017, pp. 1– 37.
Chavoshi, N., Hamooni, H., & Mueen, A. Temporal patterns in bot activities. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, International World Wide Web. Conferences Steering Committee, 2017, pp. 1601-1606, https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3051114. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Cho, C.H., M.L. Martens, H. Kim, and M. Rodrigue. “Astroturfing Global Warming: It Isn’t Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence.” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 104, no. 4, 2011, pp. 571–87, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0950-6. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Creswell, J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd ed. Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
Ferrara, E., O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. “The Rise of Social Bots.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 7, 2016, pp. 96–104, https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717. Accessed 27 november 2020.
FGV DAPP. Robôs, redes sociais e política no Brasil: Estudo sobre interferências ilegítimas no debate público na web, 20 Aug. 2017, http://dapp.fgv.br/robos-redes-sociais-e-politica-estudo-da-fgvdapp-aponta-interferencias-ilegitimas-no-debate-publico-na-web. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Forum on Information and Democracy, Working Group on Infodemics - Design a Policy Framework, June 2020,https://informationdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ForumID_Report-on-infodemics_101120.pdf Accessed 28 july 2021.
González de Gómez, M. N. “Regime de informação: construção de um conceito.” Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, vol. 22, no. 3, 2012, https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/ies/article/view/14376. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Gorwa, R. “Computational Propaganda in Poland: False Amplifiers and the Digital Public Sphere”. In: Samuel Woolley and Philip N. Howard, eds. Working Paper 2017.2. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda, 2017, pp. 1-32, https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/blog/computational-propaganda-in-poland-false-amplifiers-and-the-digital-public-sphere. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Gorwa, R., and D. Guilbeault. “Understanding Bots for Policy and Research: Challenges, Methods, and Solutions.” Policy & Internet, 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.06863. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Grimme, C., M. Preuss, L. Adam, and H. Trautmann. “Social Bots: Human-Like by Means of Human Control?” Big Data, vol. 5, no. 4, 2017, pp. 279–93, http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07624. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Grupo de Mídia. Mídia Dados. São Paulo, Brasil: Grupo de Mídia, 2017.
Gundelach, P. “Grassroots Organizations.” Acta Sociologica, vol. 22, no. 2, 1979, pp. 187–89, https://doi.org/10.1177/000169937902200206. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Hoffmann, S., Taylor, E., & Bradshaw, S. “The Market of disinformation” OXTEC Oxford Techonology & Elections Commission, Oxford Internet Institute, 2019, p. 49, https://oxtec.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/115/2019/10/OxTEC-The-Market-of-Disinformation.pdf Accessed 28 july 2021.
Howard, P.N. “Deep Democracy, Thin Citizenship: The Impact of Digital Media in Political Campaign Strategy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 597, no. 1, 2005, pp. 153–70, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270139. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Howard, P.N. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Howard, P.N., S. Woolley, and R. Calo. “Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics, vol. 15, no. 2, 2018, pp. 81–93, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Hayati, P., K. Chai, V. Potdar, and A. Talevski. “HoneySpam 2.0: Profiling Web Spambot Behaviour.” In Principles of Practice in Multi-Agent Systems PRIMA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, eds. J.J. Yang, M. Yokoo, T. Ito, Z. Jin, and P. Scerri. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 335–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11161-7_23. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Jenkins, H. “The Moral Economy of Web 2.0 (Part One).” Henry Jenkins, 18 March 2008, http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2008/03/the_moral_economy_of_web_20_pa.html. Accessed 17 november 2020.
Marwick, A., and R. Lewis. “Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online.” Data & Society Research Institute, 15 May 2017, https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/. Accessed 27 november 2020.
McNutt, J.G., and K. Boland. “Astroturf, Technology and the Future of Community Mobilization: Implications for Nonprofit Theory.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, vol. 34, no. 3, 2007, pp. 165–78.
Morse, J.M. “Sampling in Grounded Theory.” In The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, eds. A. Bryant and K. Charmaz. London: SAGE Publications, 2007, pp. 229–44.
Napoli, P. M. “Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2011.
Napoli, P.M. "Automated Media: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Algorithmic Media Production and Consumption." Communication Theory, vol. 24, no. 3, 2014, pp. 340–360, https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12039. Accessed 17 november 2020.
Ong, J. C., & Cabañes, J. V. A.. Architects of Networked Disinformation - Behind the Scenes of Troll Accounts and Fake News Production in the Philippines, Newton Tech4Dev Network, 2017, p. 82 https://newtontechfordev.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ARCHITECTS-OF-NETWORKED-DISINFORMATION-FULL-REPORT.pdf Accessed July 30 2021.
Ong, J. C., & Cabañes, J. V. A. Politics and Profit in the Fake News Factory: Four work models of political trolling in the Philippines. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, 2019. https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/5december_report_philippines.pdf Accessed July 30 2021.
Papacharissi, Z. “The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere.” New Media & Society, vol. 4, no. 1, 2002, pp. 9–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Ramalho, R. “Supremo proíbe doação de empresas para campanhas eleitorais.” G1, 17 September 2015, http://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2015/09/supremo-decide-proibir-doacoes-de-empresas-para-campanhas-eleitorais.html. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Santini, R. M.; Agostini, L.; Barros, C. E.; Carvalho, D.; Rezende, R. C.; Salles, D. G.; Seto, K.; Terra, C. and Tucci, G. “Software power as soft power: a literature review on computational propaganda effects in public opinion and political process.” PArtecipazione e COnflitto, vol. 11, no. 2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p332. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Santini, R. M.; Salles, D.; Tucci, G.; Ferreira, F. and Grael, F. “Making up Audience: Media Bots and the Falsification of the Public Sphere”, Communication Studies, 71:3, 2020, pp. 466-487, DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2020.1735466 Accessed 28 July 2021.
Simonite, T. “Here Come the Marketing Bots.” MIT Technology Review, 7 April 2016, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601225/here-come-the-marketing-bots/. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Sisson, D.C. “Inauthentic Communication, Organization-Public Relationships, and Trust: A Content Analysis of Online Astroturfing News Coverage.” Public Relations Review, vol. 43, no. 4, 2017, pp. 788–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.003. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Skogerbø, E., and A.H. Krumsvik. “Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter: Intermedial Agenda Setting in Local Election Campaigns.” Journalism Practice, vol. 9, no. 3, 2015, pp. 350–66, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.950471. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Statisa. "Twitter: Most Users by Country", Statista, 2021, https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/. Accessed 30 July 2021.
Thackeray, R., B. L. Neiger, C. L. Hanson, and J. F. McKenzie. “Enhancing Promotional Strategies Within Social Marketing Programs: Use of Web 2.0 Social Media.” Health Promotion Practice, vol. 1, no. 4, 2008, pp. 338–43, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908325335. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Venturini, L. “O que Esperar do Patrocínio de Posts de Candidatos Durante a Eleição.” Nexo Jornal, 6 July 2018, https://www.nexojornal.com.br/expresso/2018/01/07/O-que-esperar-do-patroc%C3%ADnio-de-posts-de-candidatos-durante-a-elei%C3%A7%C3%A3o. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. “Thinking about ‘information disorder’: formats of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information”, Ireton, Cherilyn; Posetti, Julie. Journalism,‘fake news’& disinformation, 2018. Paris: Unesco, 43-54. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/f._jfnd_handbook_module_2.pdf Acessed 28 july 2021.
Wojcik, S., S. Messing, A. Smith, L. Rainie, and P. Hitlin. “Bots in the Twittersphere.” Pew Research Center, 9 April, 2018, http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/04/09/bots-in-the-twittersphere. Accessed 27 november 2020.
Woolley, S. "The Political Economy of Bots: Theory and Method in the Study of Social Automation." In The Political Economy of Robots, ed. R. Kiggins. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018, pp. 127–55.
Woolley, S., and P. N. Howard. “Automation, Algorithms, and Politics | Political Communication, Computational Propaganda, and Autonomous Agents — Introduction.” International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, 2016, pp. 4882–90.
