Development Practices of Trusted AI Systems among Canadian Data Scientists

Auteurs-es

  • Jinnie Shin Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation, University of Alberta
  • Okan Bulut Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation, University of Alberta
  • Mark J. Gierl Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation, University of Alberta

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.29173/irie377

Mots-clés :

Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, Explainability, Fairness, Machine Learning, Trust

Résumé

The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has demonstrated impeccable potential and benefits to enhance the decision-making processes in our society. However, despite the successful performance of AI systems to date, skepticism and concern remain regarding whether AI systems could form a trusting relationship with human users. Developing trusted AI systems requires careful consideration and evaluation of its reproducibility, interpretability, and fairness, which in in turn, poses increased expectations and responsibilities for data scientists. Therefore, the current study focused on understanding Canadian data scientists’ self-confidence in creating trusted AI systems, while relying on their current AI system development practices.

Cover for the AI, Ethics and Society special issue of the International Review of Information Ethics

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2020-06-30

Comment citer

Shin, Jinnie, Okan Bulut, et Mark J. Gierl. 2020. « Development Practices of Trusted AI Systems Among Canadian Data Scientists ». The International Review of Information Ethics 28 (juin). Edmonton, Canada. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie377.

Numéro

Vol. 28 (2020): Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society

Rubrique

Article

Licence

Under the CC-BY 4.0 license, you have the right to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.