Ethics and AI Innovation


  • Cordel Green Broadcasting Commission of Jamaica
  • Anthony Clayton Broadcasting Commission of Jamaica



Artificial Intelligence, AI Ethics, Ethical decision-making, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Legislation, Trust


The Fourth Industrial Revolution has astonishing potential to solve many of humanity’s problems, but it has also brought about an array of new threats. The challenge is to find a way to mitigate the negatives of the Revolution without impairing the extraordinary potential of AI to accelerate all areas of human development. AI ethics offers a possible basis for doing so by providing a set of aspirational ideals as to the role of AI, rather than a minimum standard for compliance which is likely to become increasingly irrelevant. Throughout history, humans have adapted and adjusted to the technologies of the time and though the integration of AI into all human experience and decision-making will come to be seen as normal and taken for granted, there will still be a number of profound ethical choices that must be made. Implementing ethical AI will require a multi-modal and co-regulatory approach. There are a variety of existing approaches but some common principles have emerged. These provide a framework for action.



Capurro, Rafael: Agar, N. Don’t Worry about Superintelligence. Journal of Evolution and Technology 26 (1) (February): 73-82, 2016. (

Agar, N. “Why a technologically enhanced future will not be as good as we think”, OUP Blog, posted July 20, 2015. (

Agar, N. We must not create beings with moral standing superior to ours, Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (11):709, 2013.

Allan, T and Widdison,R. ‘Can computers make contracts?’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 9, 25–52, 1996.

Bayamlioglu, E. Intelligent Agents and Their Legal Status, 2008.

Bernat, E. “Which Beings Should Be Entitled to Human Right?” Medical Law International March, Vol 9 no.1 pp. 1-12, 2008.

Bostrom, N. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. (

Bostrom, N. When Machines Outsmart Humans, Futures. Vol. 35:7, 759, 2014.

Bostrom, N. A History of Transhumanist Thought, Academic Writing Across the Disciplines, eds. Michael Rectenwald & Lisa Carl (New York: Pearson Longman, 2011.

Brooks, R.A. ‘Intelligence without representations’, Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–159, 1991.

Brownsword, R. 'What the World Needs Now: Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity' in R. Brownsword (ed.), Global Governance and Human Rights, 2019.,%20techno-regulation%20human%20rights%20human%20dignity.pdf.

Bushaus, D, “Does the ‘G Mafia; control the future of AI” Inform January 2019.

Bygrave, L.A. “Electronic Agents and Privacy: A Cyberspace Odyssey 2001” - Int J Law Info Tech, Vol 9 (3): 275, 2001.

Calo, R. Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap, 51 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 399, 2017.

Carroll, J “Artificial Intelligence & Robotics in Construction: “Massively Transformative”, January 17, 2019.

Chropra, S & White, L. Artificial Agents - Personhood in Law and Philosophy, 2004.

Deng, B. Machine ethics: The robot’s dilemma Working out how to build ethical robots is one of the thorniest challenges in artificial intelligence. Nature International Weekly Journal of Science, July 1. 2015

Fenwick, Mark D.; Kaal, Wulf A. Ph.D., & Vermeulen, Erik P.M. "Regulation Tomorrow: What Happens When Technology Is Faster than the Law?," American University Business Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2018. Available at:

Field, C. South Korean Robot Ethics Charter. PhD thesis (part), University of Technology, Sydney. South Korean Robot Ethics Charter, 2012.

Fjeld, J et al “Principled Artificial Intelligence”, Berkman Klein Center, February 14, 2020.

Future of Life Institute, Global AI Policy. n.d.:

Gasser, Urs, & Virgilio A.F. Almeida. “A Layered Model for AI Governance.” IEEE Internet Computing 21 (6) (November): 58–62, 2017. doi:10.1109/mic.2017.4180835.

Citable link

Genus, A & Stirling, A. Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation. Research Policy, 2017. 10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012.

Glenn, L.M. “Biotechnology at the Margins of Personhood: An Evolving Legal Paradigm”, Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol 13, 2003.

Glenn, L.M. “Case Study: Ethical and Legal Issues in Human Machine Mergers (Or the Cyborgs Cometh), 21 Annals Health L. 175, 2012. Available at:

Glen, L.M. “A Legal Perspective on Humanity, Personhood, and Species Boundaries”, The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 3, Number 3, pp. 27-28, 2003.

Goodman, J. “The Only Way is Ethics”, The Law Society Gazette, 21 May 2018.

Green, C and Clayton, A; “Tipping or Tripping Point, pp. 68-69, 2019.

Gunkel, D. “Apocalyptic rhetoric about AI distracts from more immediate, pressing concerns”, December 9, 2014.

Information Age, “ on artificial intelligence and data independence”, 2018.

Karnow,C.E.A. 'The Encrypted Self: Fleshing out the Rights of Electronic Personalities', The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, pp. 1, 12–13, 1994.

Leslie, D. Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector. The Alan Turing Institute, 2019.

Lutz, C, Schottler, M., & Hoffmann, CP. “The privacy implications of social robots: Scoping reviews and expert interviews”, Mobile Media & Communication, Vol. 7(3) 412–434, 2019.

McDermott, D. “Why Ethics is a High Hurdle for AI”, n.d.

More, M and Vita-More, N. The Transhumanist Reader, 2018.

Moreira, C and Ferguson, D. The transHuman Code, Greenleaf Book Group press, 2019.

Muehlhauser, L. “Intelligence Explosion and Machine Ethics” (

Negroponte, Being Digital (Hodder & Stoughton: London 1995), especially pp. 149 et seq; referenced in Electronic Agents and Privacy: A Cyberspace Odyssey 2001 - Int J Law Info Tech, Vol 9 (3): 275 Lee A. Bygrave, 2001.

Putnam C, The Doctrine of Man: A Critique of Christian Transhumanism April 28, 2011,

Rivard, M.D. Toward a General Theory of Constitutional Personhood: A Theory of Constitutional Personhood for Transgenic Humanoid Species, 39 UCLA Law Review 1425, 1992.

Rivard, M.D. Constitutional Personhood. Power Point presentation at Terasem Movement Symposium, December 10, 2006.

Ruse H.G. Electronic Agents and the Legal Protection of Non-creative Databases. Int J Law Info Tech, Vol 9 (3): 295, 2001.

Savirimuthu, J. Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence - Int J Law Info Tech, Vol 26 (4): 337 at 342, 2018.

Solum, L.B. Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, pp. 1231, 1992. Electronic Paper Collection:

The Guardian, 25 October 2011,

UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation, 2018. “the age of digital interdependence Report”

Weiss, A. Validation of an Evaluation Framework for Human-Robot Interaction. The Impact of Usability, Social Acceptance, User Experience, and Societal Impact on Collaboration with Humanoid Robots. PhD thesis, University of Salzburg, 2010.

Wooldridge & Jennings, 'Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice'. 10 The Knowledge Engineering Review, no. 2, pp. 115–152, 1995.

World Economic Forum, “What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution?”, 2016., 2016 WEF, “What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution?”

World Economic Forum, “The Future of Jobs Report”, 18 January 2018.




How to Cite

Green, Cordel, and Anthony Clayton. 2021. “Ethics and AI Innovation”. The International Review of Information Ethics 29 (March). Edmonton, Canada.